The Future of Medicine – Technology Will Replace 80% Of What Doctors Do

We usually turn to technology in order to improve the efficiency of our everyday lives. We use it for transport, entertainment, calculating or evaluating tests, but most importantly we use it for data analysis. In other words, much like using Virgin Games Promo Code helps those who like to gamble online have more fun, using algorithms can be incredibly helpful, especially when business decisions are concerned. We also analyze various test results in medicine in order to identify what is wrong with the patient. So, is it wrong to assume that the future of medicine that relies more on tech will be able to replica 80% of what doctors do? Let’s find out.

Vinod Khosla

Vinod Khosla is one of the richest businessmen in the world and he is the one who stated that technology will replace doctors. Of course, these are statements that make people look cool, as it’s something we all love to hear. We love the idea of progress and that the future is bright. Even now, doctors are heavily relying on technology and medicine is more effective than before. That being said, the system has its flaws.

As for the statement, it’s not something we should just agree with. This has nothing to do with the issue of economy and jobs, it’s really about Vinod and the fact that he is not a doctor. The statement is pretty bold, and it would make more sense if it was endorsed by doctors with extensive knowledge in technology and how it functions. 

If you think about it, a 3rd-year medicine student has already forgotten the majority of the lessons from the first two years of his studies. So, why would anyone believe that Vinod has credible knowledge to back his claim. It’s just a businessman hyping his products, which is what they all do. Elon Musk is not a scientist or an astronaut yet he constantly talks about colonizing Mars, without ever bothering to explain minute details of this colonization and how it would work.

This Would be Great for Doctors

It’s important to note that nobody would mind if this was the case. Doctors are not going to struggle because the machines are taking on a bigger workload. In fact, this would make it more convenient to treat a greater number of patients and make diagnostics easier. Even if the algorithm works fine, would you still fully trust the machine? Right now we can Google our symptoms and it is universally agreed that this is an unreliable method of getting treatment. 

So, anything that a machine does would still need to get approval from a doctor. Right now technology is used to speed up the development of new drugs and find more accurate treatments for certain diseases, so it’s already being extremely helpful. But it’s always good to remind people not to simply get hyped about statements like Vinod’s. Sometimes we are more prone to believing in these things simply because we want it to be true, and we lack the knowledge to understand the challenges.