Community Based Participatory Models in Hawaii:

Identifying Barriers and Assets for Changes to Address Chronic Diseases

 

Hawaii’s Community Health Division (CHD) is in the process (on-going) of developing and facilitating a “social infrastructure” for engaging communities to identify the barriers and assets in their communities which can address chronic diseases and their risk factors. Such community engagement models are encouraged by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1997), and are only recently being used to address health in the Pacific Islands (Davison et al, 2004).

 

The intended outcomes are twofold: (1) to describe what specific communities identify as the barriers and assets for change in their communities relevant to chronic diseases and their risk factors and (2) such models are designed to serve as a tool for programs to utilize information tapped from communities to address change, as well as tools for communities for leadership development and empowerment.

 

Focused group discussions began in January 2004 with a Native Hawaiian community group, a Filipino community group and a group from rural areas and Neighbor Islands. Additional information was obtained from focus groups held with different age groups in Filipino communities, specifically conducted about tobacco use (Fancher and Lipshur, 2004).

 

Environmental Change Initiation

 

The population of the State of Hawaii, when compared to other States, is viewed as healthy on most indicators of morbidity and mortality, yet there are ethnic and socio-economic differences in rates of chronic and other diseases and subsequently mortality. Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders (including Micronesian migrants), Filipinos, people with low income and/or low education, and people in rural areas have the worst measures on behavioral risk factors, subsequent health problems and death rates. At the same time, little is known about why such disparities exist or persist, except to note that certain groups are economically or otherwise marginalized. Public health prevention programs have generally not been culturally competent, sensitive or appropriate; further, they tend to lack community inclusion and input from at-risk populations they are targeted to serve (Yamashita et al, 2005).

 

The focus of this on-going process is not just to do surveillance and describe the disease burden and on-going disparities (e.g. “…counting the sick and the dead”, Finau, 2002), but to move further along to help diverse communities identify the barriers, as well as strengths and assets that they can use to focus on change (Cooperrider et al, 2003).

 

Public Health Agency Roles

 

Within the CHD, as a result of many community based projects (and subsequent evaluations), there arose a need to set standards around cultural competency and cultural appropriateness for contractors. Subsequently, the CHD initiated several community based focus groups to get input from communities on cultural competency. This is part of an on-going process to address health disparities. In addition, as CHD programs state they are working with disparate groups, there is an expectation that there will be an engagement process that includes and involves these identified groups who in turn can influence decisions about the program.

 

Major Partners

 

Existing CHD branch and program contacts and links to community-based organizations, partners and coalitions have all been part of this process and assist in wider based community level contacts with key informants in targeted communities. Community partners were also recruited from existing contacts within specific communities (e.g. Filipino youth were recruited with the assistance of contacts at the University of Hawaii).

 

Official Support

 

Numerous public officials have assisted by either participating or recruiting key community contacts. There is no “official” sanction of this project; however, key CHD staff have played a key role in the Department of Health’s on-going development of cultural competency guidelines.

 

Results from the Environmental Change

 

The current outcomes of this process are still unfolding since it in progress and on-going. The feedback from the communities themselves is the current outcome. Further, in such a process, the communities themselves may be the driving force behind articulating the outcomes or changes they want to envision.

 

 

 

Lessons Learned

 

The most important lessons we are learning about this process is its utility for use among a wide variety of groups and topic areas in chronic diseases. All chronic disease programs are employing community-based outreach models, with varying degrees of community participation. The level of participation depends on the disease or risk factor, the length of time the program has developed committed relationships in communities over time, as well as other factors we are still exploring.

 

Additional efforts in community based-participatory models by the CHD include:

 

·        Outreach efforts in cancer screening (Pobutsky, Pordell, Yamashita et al, 2004).

·        Working to engage Micronesian migrant communities and other stakeholders in Hawaii (Pobutsky, Buenconseujo-Lum, Chow et al, 2005).

·        On-going participation in a statewide obesity Task Force which developed a “White Paper” on obesity which then led to numerous Legislative Bills and Resolutions in 2005 and 2006.

 

For more information, contact:

 

Barbara Yamashita, MSW

Chief, Community Health Division

bayamash@doh.hawaii.gov

or

Ann Pobutsky, PhD

Chronic Disease Epidemiologist

ann.m.pobutsky@doh.hawaii.gov

 

Community Health Division

Hawaii State Department of Health

1250 Punchbowl St.

Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813

(808) 586-4126

(808) 586-4791 FAX


 

 

References

 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1997). Principles of Community Engagement. Atlanta, GA: CDC/ASTDR Committee on Community Engagement. Available at: http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/dphsdr/FaithBase/PCE/PrinciplesOfComm.asp.

 

Cooperrider, D.L., D. Whitney and J.M. Stavros (2003). Appreciative inquiry handbook: Workbooks for leaders of change. Bedford Heights, Ohio: Lakeshore Publishers.

 

Davison, N, R. Workman, Y.G. Daida, R. Novotny and D. Ching (2004). Health living in the Pacific Islands: Results of a focus group process to identify perceptions of health and collaboration in the U.S. affiliated Pacific Islands. Journal of Extension, Vol. 42, No. 5. Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/2004october/rb4.shtml.

 

Fancher, E. and J. Lipsher (2004). Using a community-based participatory research model to gather information on Filipino-American knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to tobacco use on Oahu, Hawaii.  Unpublished research paper. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Office of Smoking and Health and the Hawaii Department of Health, Tobacco Prevention and Education Program. For more information, or a copy, contact: EFancher@cdc.gov or jdlipshe@mail.health.state.hi.us.

 

Finau, Sitaleki A., Iris L. Wainiqolo and Giuseppe Cuboni (2002). Health Transition and Globalization in the Pacific: Vestiges of Colonialism? Working Papers and Papers in Progress No. 2. Suva: Fiji School of Medicine, School of Public Health and Primary Care.

 

Pobutsky, A.M., P. Pordell, B. Yamashita, D. Wong-Tomiyasu, Wendy Ku’upio Nihoa. K. Kitagawa, et.al. (2004). Community based participatory approaches to address health disparities in Hawaii: Recent applications in cancer prevention, detection and treatment programs. Pacific Health Dialog, September 2004.

 

Pobutsky, Ann, Lee Buenconsejo-Lum, Catherine Chow, Neal Papafox and Gregory Maskerinc (2005). Micronesian Migrants in Hawaii: Health issues, and cultural appropriate, community based approaches. Submitted and accepted for publication: The California Journal of Health Promotion (Winter/Spring 2005) Special Issue on Hawaii, December. Available at: http://www.csuchico.edu/cjhp/3/4/59-72-pobutsky.pdf. (Accessed 2/9/05).

 

Yamashita, B., A. Pobutsky, D. Wong Tomiyasu, and L. Nakao. (2005) Public Health Villains or Good Guys: Do We Know the Difference? Presentation at the 19th Annual National Conference On Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, March 1-3, 2005, Atlanta, Georgia. For more information, contact: bayamash@doh.hawaii.gov or ann.m.pobutsky@doh.hawaii.gov. Hawaii State Department of Health, Community Health Division.